It's not, but as a Christian they did post some sources they would like us to consult with and also said they didn't wanna litigate so I think that's okay. Occ

It's not, but as a Christian they did post some sources they would like us to consult with and also said they didn't wanna litigate so I think that's okay. Occams razor says Jesus was probably a real person that developed a following and caused a big commotion. That seems to be the general consensus from secular historians as well (no Dan Brown stuff here). But the theory about Paul that they brought up is at least an interesting alternative despite me not being convinced right now that it's as likely. So I appreciate them putting the time and effort in to share. I'm a fan of HackerNews being open minded to less popular scientific or historical or religious theories so long as they aren't in totally obvious crank territory (and I don't think what they said is in that territory, it makes at least some amount of intuitive sense).