3 ms·
Let keep it going until there are no young Ukraine men alive. That's what is best? Most Ukrainian want to talk peace but the powers in charge want to keep Rus
by ipaddr 2y ago
Let keep it going until there are no young Ukraine men alive. That's what is best?
Most Ukrainian want to talk peace but the powers in charge want to keep Russia fighting and weak even if it means more Ukraine deaths.
- thiht 2y ago> That's what is best? What is best is Russia surrendering, paying for all damages in Ukraine, and Putin getting arrested and tried internationally.
- ipaddr 2y agoWhat is best for Russia is to let NATO put nukes on Ukraine soil pointing at Moscow? That's what Russia is fighting against.
- thiht 2y agoYeah sure.
- ipaddr 2y ago[flagged]
- aguaviva 2y agoExcept that's not what NATO has been doing (nor is there any evidence that it ever had that intent) -- and it certainly isn't the reason Russia's current regime (not Russia as a country) started this war. It's just the message it projects, mostly for internal propaganda purposes -- to rile up its masses, and get them to sign up for the meat grinder; and to mollify opposition abroad. If you believe that stuff, then you definitely start thinking more critically about whatever sources you've been pulling from.
- ipaddr 2y agoUS had a similar reaction when Russia tried to place missiles in Cuba. This information was in a variety of sources. Ones you respect and ones that you don't.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- aguaviva 2y agoThis information was in a variety of sources. Meaning you aren't actually aware of any.
- ipaddr 2y agoLooks like you only comment on Ukraine. Care to disclose your affiliations?
- aguaviva 2y agoIt looks like you've made another factual misrepresentation.
- ipaddr 2y agoThis your first post on Putin and world politics? Or just the last in a series of similar shilling!
- aguaviva 2y agoOr just the last in a series of similar shilling! You're in explicit violation of site guidelines. Recommend you stop: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- mopsi 2y agoThe funny thing with people like you is the fact that the polar opposite of what you are saying is a pretty good approximation of truth. NATO nukes stand where they stood during Nixon and nobody has any intention to move them anywhere. Only Russia has been inching them westward, giving nukes to tin-pot dictators like Lukashenko, pointing them at Europe and threatening to destroy cities like London.
- aguaviva 2y agoBTW a more guidelines-compliant response to what you're asking would have been: "What leads you to believe that that's actually the case (that NATO was about to, or was likely at some point down the road to do that)?" Given that in the 30 years since the fall of the USSR, NATO still hasn't stationed nukes in any of the newer member countries, nor would there be any strategic benefit for them to do so.
- ipaddr 2y ago[flagged]