Aslan is such a dishonest broker that it would be difficult to take a recommendation seriously even if without so many anti-endorsements from historians: > "As

Aslan is such a dishonest broker that it would be difficult to take a recommendation seriously even if without so many anti-endorsements from historians: > "Aslan's grandiose claims and his limited credentials in history is glaring on almost every page." > "His book is filled with mistakes and inaccuracies... about Roman history, about the New Testament, about the history of early Christianity." [...] Ehrman comments that the book is well-written [as a work from a professor of creative writing], but "I don't think it's trustworthy as a historical account."