3 ms·
Hard disagree. The most important part of the election, from a news perspective, will be during/after the count, especially if it looks like Harris will win, or
by duderific 2y ago
Hard disagree. The most important part of the election, from a news perspective, will be during/after the count, especially if it looks like Harris will win, or it's exceedingly close. Maybe this wouldn't be the case pre-Trump, when elections were decided relatively quickly, and you could assume a peaceful transfer of power.
- decremental 2y ago[dead]
- austhrow743 2y agoWhat part are you disagreeing with?
- XajniN 2y agoThe part he clearly didn’t understand
- llm_trw 2y ago>when elections were decided relatively quickly, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore I wonder how people who seem to care so much about politics don't spend any time reading about politics beyond rage bait headlines. The NYT burning to the ground doesn't seem like a bad outcome if it will force people to use wikipedia which still has hyperlinks.
- tourmalinetaco 2y agoBecause most people who “care” about politics like this are radicalized due to their bubble. Add in a fair mix of a lack of civics classes and inexperience with politics and you get very loud people with no idea what’s going on.
- kmacdough 2y agoWho is harmed and how? Students only have one school and limited options for the SATs. The results draw the most attention, but there are countless reputable sources people can turn to, and little lost by learning the results a bit later.