> Because that is bad for the individual worker. Not necessarily. Sure it is better if every other factor is held equal, but it's not: everyone benefits from l

> Because that is bad for the individual worker. Not necessarily. Sure it is better if every other factor is held equal, but it's not: everyone benefits from living in a more highly economically developed society where industry is more successful. So you have to weigh pro-worker concerns against these other benefits. If your argument were valid then its logical conclusion would be that all profit from the business has to distributed to the employees (as in most traditional strains of far-left thought). In practice systems like that have major flaws.