> There is no shortage of long talks that lack nuance. Nuance is not the same thing as a talk designed to build an argument bit by bit and be persuasive. You c

> There is no shortage of long talks that lack nuance. Nuance is not the same thing as a talk designed to build an argument bit by bit and be persuasive. You could summarise an hour-long closing argument for the defence in a jury trial as 'My client is not guilty', but doing so is rather missing the point. > Just say that no, you can't effectively summarize this video, instead of doing whatever it is that you are doing here. x == y, but with the added implication that SBF's take on longform is not actually something to aspire to.