3 ms·
You can decide that that's the ending you'd like to have. But I don't see a point in pretending that it would be "best for Ukraine", or rule of law in the inte
by aguaviva 2y ago
You can decide that that's the ending you'd like to have.
But I don't see a point in pretending that it would be "best for Ukraine", or rule of law in the international sphere generally.
Russian forces pushed back to Moscow
That's a straw man of course, and a pretty ridiculous one at that. But if you prefer to live in a world of extreme caricatures, and to reason accordingly, that's your prerogative also.
- TMWNN 2y ago>You can decide that that's the ending you'd like to have. Ah yes, yet another person who prattles "Anything other than `100% Russia gives up everything and Putin shoots himself in shame` = `RUZZIA AND PUTLER WIN!!!1!!!!!` Anyone saying anything else = Vatnik!!1!1!!". Straw man, indeed. >But I don't see a point in pretending that it would be "best for Ukraine", or rule of law in the international sphere generally. Let me repeat: It is not up to Ukraine to decide! It is up to Russia on one side of a negotiating table, and Ukraine and its sponsors on the other. Let us not pretend that for you "best for Ukraine" is, and only is, something not too far from what you claim are my "straw man" of your goals. Or that of the hordes of Redditards who still haven't noticed that after 2.5 years of incessant posts on /r/worldnews and a dozen other subreddits on how Ukraine is beating back vatniks every single day, Russians are somehow still fighting on what is legally Ukrainian territory. (The same goes for Russian propaganda that has claimed for its domestic audience for the past 2.5 years that its anti-fascist forces are daily crushing Ukrainian Nazis left, right, and center.)
- aguaviva 2y agoAh yes, yet another person who says ... Absolutely no one here is saying that.