4 ms·
> But the overall 'subscription everything' model is not really justified by costs Probably shouldn't subscribe then ...
by dools 2y ago
> But the overall 'subscription everything' model is not really justified by costs
Probably shouldn't subscribe then ...
- zdragnar 2y agoI think the argument is that you shouldn't choose to price a product as a subscription simply because you have recurring costs. If I subscribe to a magazine or a streaming service, I continually get new content. Apps that aren't doing that are basically price gouging customers.
- hanifc 2y agoIt’s nice of you to consider the wellbeing of other users, but I think every adult has the right to make their own decisions about how to spend their money. If it’s not a price you’re willing to pay, that’s fine. But if someone else gets value out of it and thinks it’s a fair trade, that’s between them and the app creator.
- simoncion 2y ago> But if someone else gets value out of it and thinks it’s a fair trade, that’s between them and the app creator. Since we're apparently now doing Freshman Civics: There are many sorts of transactions that someone would get value from and think are a fair trade, but are prohibited for one reason or another. Even for those somewhat-antisocial transactions that aren't prohibited, there's no rule that says that you can't complain about how those transactions could be more pro-social.
- oasisaimlessly 2y ago> Even for those somewhat-antisocial transactions that aren't prohibited, there's no rule that says that you can't complain about how those transactions could be more pro-social. Yeah, and there's also no rule that says that other people can't tell you to shut up.
- AlexeyBelov 2y agoWhy do you feel the need to tell them to shut up?
- _flux 2y agoHow about the argument that having recurring income incentivizes further development, whereas single-pay fees incentivize customer acquisition?