OCR is a process that usually incorporates some form of A.I., such as pattern matching, and neural networks. So, the corpus of scanned text in the Internet Arch

OCR is a process that usually incorporates some form of A.I., such as pattern matching, and neural networks. So, the corpus of scanned text in the Internet Archive, Hathi Trust, Google Books, those have already been run through AI-enhancement. Wikipedians use A.I., especially to identify and revert vandalism, such as the ClueBot line, and similar heuristics are now incorporated into the revision logging. If more of the headlines, photos, and article text published by news outlets is LLM-generated, then new additions to Wikipedia will be summaries of LLM material already. Just prior to paywall, the article mentions "starting with AI detection tools", so that's going to be wildly inaccurate from the start. I'd like to see someone run LLM detection on Good and Featured Articles; what percentage would be flagged there?