3 ms·
> Simple computerized systems are incredibly accurate and reliable, easily moreso than humans. Such systems are better enough that businesses handling cash use
by aesh2Xa1 2y ago
> Simple computerized systems are incredibly accurate and reliable, easily moreso than humans.
Such systems are better enough that businesses handling cash use them to count paper money.
Next to voting, or perhaps ahead of it, people surely value reliable accuracy in their money. So why not ballots?
- vacuity 2y agoBecause the current implementations for ballots don't feel up to snuff, and I at least don't trust profit-driven companies to make "simple computerized systems" that are auditable and whatnot. Get a good solution in place for many election cycles and then we can all be happy.