4 ms·
Human counters can be biased, and they're definitely more inaccurate. Machines, unless actively exploited by a third party, will always do the same thing, time
by sadeshmukh 2y ago
Human counters can be biased, and they're definitely more inaccurate. Machines, unless actively exploited by a third party, will always do the same thing, time after time. I don't believe it's worth the extra expenditure to hire tens of thousands of counters (again, human counters adds manual counting into the process, meaning another place for it to go wrong/be manipulated) when machines do the same thing with no fuss.
- simiones 2y ago> Machines, unless actively exploited by a third party, will always do the same thing, time after time. That "unless" is the whole problem. And it's not just if a third party gets involved, it can well be from the builders or the current operators of the machine who are the ones actively exploiting it as well.