3 ms·
They've been back. One of the main reasons I went with the car I ended up buying was because it had buttons. And it's fast. And it has carplay. And I don't have
by internet101010 2y ago
They've been back. One of the main reasons I went with the car I ended up buying was because it had buttons. And it's fast. And it has carplay. And I don't have to press the (A) button every time I turn on the car to disable the engine off at red light thing.
- maleldil 2y ago> disable the engine off at red light thing. Why do you do that? I find that it barely impacts my driving experience, and it's an easy way to decrease emissions.
- timbit42 2y agoIsn't it hard on the starter?
- 39896880 2y agoThe automatic stop-start system found in newer cars isn’t especially hard on the starter. These systems have reinforced bearings, faster engagement mechanisms, direct fuel injection or integrated starter generators, which start the engine without relying on a starter motor at all.
- VGHN7XDuOXPAzol 2y agoNot the person you're asking, but I find it adds a delay to setting off and frequently feels 'wrong' because it cuts the engine for a very short time. (I don't often drive at rush hour, so often I might just stop at a light for literally 1 or 2 seconds whilst it notices I'm there and then switches over to green, or maybe I've timed it almost right to slow down gradually to the lights and only have to stop for a short time at the end.) I don't know anything but I have been wondering if it might actually be worse for emissions and engine wear for the auto to cut off only for 1 or 2 seconds each time. I can see the appeal in traffic with longer waits though?
- maleldil 2y agoI envy that you only stop at lights for 1-2 seconds. Where I live, you'll find not only heavy traffic but also red lights that are several minutes long.