3 ms·
Should there be no balance between state size? California always determining the president and ensuring Montana and Rhode Island are never campaigned in?
by sethammons 2y ago
Should there be no balance between state size? California always determining the president and ensuring Montana and Rhode Island are never campaigned in?
- unethical_ban 2y agoI am not convinced states should be the decider of president, rather than the people. Besides, in your example, neither of those states matter anyway. Why should Pennsylvania be so important, merely because the electorate seems evenly split between the two major parties?