4 ms·
> Mail-in ballots are worst of all, and the people who advocate for their expansion will regret it when they see entire church memberships filling out their bal
by dragonwriter 2y ago
> Mail-in ballots are worst of all, and the people who advocate for their expansion will regret it when they see entire church memberships filling out their ballots together, checking each other to make sure they voted correctly, and shunning, expelling, or firing people who don’t participate.
Firing people for not cooperating with something that is a crime under both federal and state law is a strategy that…doesn’t work very long for the criminals.
(Giving a large group of people who you don’t trust to vote your way that kind of criminal leverage over you in general is a pretty self-defeating strategy even without the intense incentives produced when you pile termination of employment on top of it.)
Also, near-universal mail-in voting isn’t some novel untested practice. Oregon has been doing it for more than two decades, Washington and Colorado for a decade, and even more states have adopted it between 2019 and 2022.
- gotoeleven 2y agoAnd what a diversity of election results those states have had since then!
- mulmen 2y agoWhy would mail in voting create more diverse results? States that don’t mail ballots also haven’t had diverse results. These concepts are orthogonal. Mail in voting is intended to improve turnout, not diversify results.
- Spivak 2y agoYou can vote by mail in all 50 states, and both red and swing states have no-excuse absentee. Your point doesn't stand up to the reality of these systems.