> It might be interesting to hear out the criticisms against Latour's way of reasoning, instead of dismissing it. I’m not sure you read my post, it sounds like

> It might be interesting to hear out the criticisms against Latour's way of reasoning, instead of dismissing it. I’m not sure you read my post, it sounds like you just assumed its contents, which was not in fact about being free to ignore Latour, but about being free to critique him with or without an understanding of what he’s trying to say. If you read it you’d know that of course I’d be happy to hear out the criticisms against Latour’s reasoning, but they’ll be much more powerful if they come with an understanding of what he’s trying to say in the first place.