Here's a quote from the abstract of the paper: > Using an event study design with UK Biobank data comparing adults conceived just before or after rationing end

Here's a quote from the abstract of the paper: > Using an event study design with UK Biobank data comparing adults conceived just before or after rationing ended, we found that early-life rationing reduced diabetes and hypertension risk by about 35% and 20%, respectively, and delayed disease onset by 4 and 2 years. Protection was evident with in-utero exposure and increased with postnatal sugar restriction, especially after six months when solid foods likely began. Which part of the title isn't supported by the paper?