5 ms·
This isn't what the paper actually says, of course. Science by press release again.
by b800h 2y ago
This isn't what the paper actually says, of course. Science by press release again.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Thorrez 2y agoHere's a quote from the abstract of the paper: > Using an event study design with UK Biobank data comparing adults conceived just before or after rationing ended, we found that early-life rationing reduced diabetes and hypertension risk by about 35% and 20%, respectively, and delayed disease onset by 4 and 2 years. Protection was evident with in-utero exposure and increased with postnatal sugar restriction, especially after six months when solid foods likely began. Which part of the title isn't supported by the paper?