3 ms·
> GitHub's AI decided to When you say "GitHub's AI", you have to be absolutely crystal clear whether you mean an automated process or an AI-powered system that
by talldayo 2y ago
> GitHub's AI decided to
When you say "GitHub's AI", you have to be absolutely crystal clear whether you mean an automated process or an AI-powered system that has gone rogue. The difference in implications is significant and conflating the two isn't likely to help your case.
> We really need federated Git hosting to become popular at this point.
> especially when it has a monopoly in the market and is basically required in the current job market
There are more GitHub alternatives than you can shake a stick at. There are managed Git solutions, self-hosted Git solutions, manually-managed NAS repos, Git/GitHub alternatives and hundreds of methods of file versioning.
I really don't think you can call GitHub a monopoly with a straight face. Maybe you could argue they're an unnecessarily critical part of online infrastructure, but anything hosted on GitHub can be migrated elsewhere with little effort.
- cheesycod 2y ago> When you say "GitHub's AI", you have to be absolutely crystal clear whether you mean an automated process or an AI-powered system that has gone rogue. The difference in implications is significant and conflating the two isn't likely to help your case. Its clearly some sort of automated process (the security logs mention a process called `spamurai` which I assume means Spam User Removal AI) that one day decided that I was 'spammy' and hence flagged me down.