yeah, ive used llama.cpp grammars before, which is why i was thinking about it. i just think it'd be cool for llamafile to do basically that, but with included

yeah, ive used llama.cpp grammars before, which is why i was thinking about it. i just think it'd be cool for llamafile to do basically that, but with included defaults so you could eg, require JSON output. it could be cool for prototyping or something. but i dont think that would be too useful anyway, most of the time i think you would want to restrict it to a specific schema, so i can only see it being useful for something like a tiny local LLM for code completion, but that would just encourage valid-looking but incorrect code. i think i just like the idea of restricting LLM output, it has a lot of interesting use cases