Thanks for sharing, that was an interesting read. > every instruction specifies the probability with which it should be executed Is this still precise, in a w

Thanks for sharing, that was an interesting read. > every instruction specifies the probability with which it should be executed Is this still precise, in a way that prompting llms isn't? I'd need to explore the language in more depth to answer that, but if it does what I assume which is basically a string of instructions like do x with probability y, then it's still precise, except we're using probability theory in addition to/instead of standard programming logic.