> And they can and did provide evidence, you simply ignored it. That's simply a lie. They didn't. Nowhere on that website was Lynn quoted as describing himself

> And they can and did provide evidence, you simply ignored it. That's simply a lie. They didn't. Nowhere on that website was Lynn quoted as describing himself as a "scientific racist". > Meanwhile, it's an empirical fact that Lynn is a racist What would be the evidence for this claim? There could in any case be an association between IQ and East Asian ancestry. Whether there is, is an empirical question, and an empirical hypothesis can't be racist, it is just true or false, or supported/unsupported by the evidence. In the source I provided, Lynn references statistical evidence that supports it.