4 ms·

it's shocking how low-quality these issues are in a client that is otherwise 1000x more performant than the other options listed in the article

• coppsilgold 2y ago
  Deluge performs just as well as qBittorrent. libtorrent-rasterbar (libtorrent.org) is what is performant.
  • deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
  • magxnta 2y ago
    I found the deluge (web?) ui becoming unusable after adding tens (or hundreds?) of thousands of torrents. Not sure about the details, but a decade ago I used to seed all files below 100MB on many private trackers for seed bonus points, and yea, deluge ui (might have been the web ui, not sure) became very slow. :D
    • dawnerd 2y ago
      Same, deluge and qbittorrent would start to have issues with very large or lots of torrents. Ended up with transmission with the trguiNG UI and its handled everything. It's not perfect and often slow but it hasn't crashed.
    • treyd 2y ago
      I ran into slowdowns in the remote control after just a few hundred. I switched to transmission shortly after. I had a great time using Deluge for probably like 6-7 years but Transmission is more performant has more tooling support.
  • 1oooqooq 2y ago
    moved to transmission