4 ms·
Relevant: https://github.com/commaai/body#comma-body https://github.com/commaai/body#comma-body (I'm aware that the Comma Body just uses wheels, and thus differ
by mdaniel 2y ago
Relevant: https://github.com/commaai/body#comma-body https://github.com/commaai/body#comma-body (I'm aware that the Comma Body just uses wheels, and thus differs from Upkie in that Upkie claims to support uneven terrains)
I had no idea about https://github.com/stephane-caron/awesome-open-source-robots https://github.com/stephane-caron/awesome-open-source-robots -- there's one of those for everything, I guess (and are also a just stunningly terrible way to distribute collections of links, IMHO, since creating Wikipedia pages is free and those can be edited by anyone with an account, versus the "open PR and pray" model of GitHub)
- TaylorAlexander 2y agoDoes Wikipedia allow content of this type? Aka “here’s some cool stuff I found”? Or put another way, if you’re more familiar with Wikipedia, can you describe how to think about this type of thing being done on Wikipedia? Thanks.
- philipwhiuk 2y agoThere's no way you get past the notability / external sources gatekeeper. This content is suitable for a wiki but not Wikipedia (And screw Fandom).
- bonoboTP 2y agoThere are many pages comparing (free/open-source) software on Wikipedia, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Software_comparisons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Software_comparisons The individual entries don't always seem to be super notable. But the notability threshold is also somewhat topic dependent. In my experience in software, it's not as strict as biographies or politically charged issues. In hacker/nerd topics things seem to operate a bit more loosely.
- avaldez_ 2y agoThe github _awesome_ pages are a meme at this point https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome-awesome-awesome-awesome https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome-awesome-awesome-awes... Concept is _awesome_, the curation so so.