3 ms·
Not sure why you are being down-voted. We're already seeing this with the team saying they won't work on M3 yet because they aren't even close to done with M2..
by WD-42 2y ago
Not sure why you are being down-voted. We're already seeing this with the team saying they won't work on M3 yet because they aren't even close to done with M2...
- kaba0 2y agoHow is that apple's fault, nor any form of "deliberate attack"? Like, come on, neither of the parties are malicious, especially not for the sake of it.
- WD-42 2y agoI didn’t say it was anyone’s fault. It’s the reality of a closed system.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 2y agoWhy don't new Intel or AMD chips require painstaking reverse engineering with each release?
- kaba0 2y agoHistorically they do, and currently they don't because their biggest market is server machines where Linux is the de facto choice. It's a life or death question for them to properly support the Linux kernel.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 2y agoIn one search I'm able to pull up Pentium documentation from 1995 as well as recent documentation from 2023. Show me the equivalent Apple Silicon docs that a compiler engineer could use.
- SG- 2y agoactually they're saying they're close to getting M3 support and the big thing that has prevented work on it as the lack of a M3 Mac Minis.