16 ms·
> but they won't do it consusrtently On certain topics they will! > No as a general rule. Which logically resolves to Yes. > More specifically they are les
by mistermann 2y ago
> but they won't do it consusrtently
On certain topics they will!
> No as a general rule.
Which logically resolves to Yes.
> More specifically they are less likely to be manipulated by outside forces
In the broad aggregate agree, but not on all topics.
> For some it may be yes, others no I think.
What if there is something like science that's yet to be invented (" a lack of outside forces"), thus people do not have access to the "intelligence" bonus it provides. Would this count, if there was such a thing?
- dennis_jeeves2 2y ago>thus people do not have access to the "intelligence" bonus it provides. Would is count, if there was such a thing? You mean will it count into sustaining stupidity? yes is the answer. ( and to be more nuanced I wouldn't call it stupidity, that's ignorance). On another note: science was never 'invented' - the spirit of inquiry was always there among minority of individuals since ancient times.
- mistermann 2y agoIs there nothing novel in the thing itself that so many people refer to, with reverence, as "science"?
- dennis_jeeves2 2y agoTrue, I don't think there is any novel concept in the term "science". ( i.e if I understood your correctly).