> Gun owners and pro 2nd amendment readers I'm a gun owner and I can overlook them using a term in a way that it is popularly used among laypeople, even if it

> Gun owners and pro 2nd amendment readers I'm a gun owner and I can overlook them using a term in a way that it is popularly used among laypeople, even if it is technically not correct [0]. Discarding the content of the article on that premise would just be abdicating my responsibility to think. [0] I gotta say, though, who exactly gets to insist on the definition of a general term like assault rifle? Seems like another instance of useless gatekeeping. A distraction.