4 ms·
The disadvantage is the same as with 401ks and the like: such a system would require every citizen to have a relationship with a fund manager. At least 401k is
by big-green-man 2y ago
The disadvantage is the same as with 401ks and the like: such a system would require every citizen to have a relationship with a fund manager. At least 401k is opt in and voluntary. Wall street would love such an arrangement, and they get guaranteed capital locked up in their shenanigans, and guaranteed management and brokerage fees from every adult citizen. And, the actual capital for these investments is still what it is, so they'll find a way to make sure that people holding these default free shares don't benefit from them significantly.
- Gud 2y agoNo, the money would be totally in control of the citizen. How would it then benefit wall st? Also consider that there are more countries in the world than the US. I think it would work great in Scandinavia and Switzerland.