Fully agree. It's even stranger (to me) that they picked an existing protocol's name, given that they never even define "RTP" in their paper. If it's just arb

Fully agree. It's even stranger (to me) that they picked an existing protocol's name, given that they never even define "RTP" in their paper. If it's just arbitrary letters, might as well avoid the collision. If it isn't arbitrary letters, please, if you're describing the protocol, you should start by describing the damn acronym.