3 ms·

This sequence replaces an infinite God with ~infinite time and then draws the wrong conclusion.

• zen928 2y ago
  You're replacing a hypothetical situation meant to illustrustrate mathematics with something else. The monkeys don't eat, evolve, age, conspire, have agendas or agency, they type randomly as a means to invoke visual imagery of a monkey slamming it's hands down ignorantly on a typewriter. It's chaotic slamming is the "input" that gets eventually distributed in different ways, one of which, if given enough time, will be identical to shakespeare. Assuming implications to theology or genetic sequencing where none were given is a reflection of your ability to handle rational discussion of the material.
  • gred 2y ago
    This sub-thread moved on from the original hypothesis as soon as innagadadavida put forward his non-empirical empirical example. Take it up with him, he may also enjoy your evaluation of his rationality.