3 ms·
Well, it'd be a surprise if the latest chip weren't the fastest. Intel is finding this out the hard way right now.
by satvikpendem 2y ago
Well, it'd be a surprise if the latest chip weren't the fastest. Intel is finding this out the hard way right now.
- thrw42A8N 2y agoIt's a surprise that a Mac Mini is faster than previous gen Mac Studio. Now I can't wait for Mac Studio with M4.
- svpk 2y agoThe surprise is that it’s only the second level chip (Standard, Pro, Max, Ultra) but that the M4 Pro outperforms both the M3 Max (there is no M3 Ultra at this point) and the M2 Ultra (a chip with almost twice as many cores as the M4 Pro).
- zamadatix 2y agoGeekbench is more a "mid threading" benchmark on the multicore. Those extra 2x cores aren't really going to do much to increase the score as a result.
- burnerthrow008 2y ago> it’s only the second level chip Sure, but (see my other comment in this thread): Max and Pro chips differ in GPU not CPU, and this benchmark says nothing about GPU performance.
- pier25 2y agoIt's like comparing the latest i5 with a previous gen i9.
- supportengineer 2y agoWho's Intel?
- Koshkin 2y agoDid you mean "whose"?
- OptionOfT 2y agoAren't the latest Intels slightly slower for a massive drop in power consumption?
- satvikpendem 2y agoOn laptops, yes, but I was referring to their latest desktop chips which are actually worse in performance than the previous generation, somehow.