4 ms·
The implication of what you're saying is that medically incapacitated individuals can't have legal representation.
by Teever 2y ago
The implication of what you're saying is that medically incapacitated individuals can't have legal representation.
- tsimionescu 2y agoOn the contrary: it means that incapacitated individuals must have legal representation. A forest is like an incapacitated individual: you can assign a legal representative to it (which was exactly what was suggested upthread) but you can't expect it to actually take legal matters into itself.
- Teever 2y agoWe are in complete agreement.