3 ms·
Cool! I didn’t see it before, maybe because I mostly use the language vs. language feature. There is no such section there, but it would be very helpful IMO, in
by lossolo 2y ago
Cool! I didn’t see it before, maybe because I mostly use the language vs. language feature. There is no such section there, but it would be very helpful IMO, instead of clicking every solution to check which one is intrinsics free.
- igouy 2y ago> language vs. language Where there are few enough programs that readers should check that the programs they compare seem appropriate for their purpose.
- lossolo 2y agoWell, it's your site, so you can do what you want with it, but I don't believe what you just wrote is logical at all. Sometimes, you just want to see, in general, how one language compares to another when one uses intrinsics and the other doesn't, without having to click through every single benchmark across multiple versions to find one without intrinsics. This is just bad UX and waste of time.
- neonsunset 2y agoSurely you wouldn’t say that if the language you wanted to win had SIMD API :)
- igouy 2y ago> one uses intrinsics and the other doesn't Why? Did you mean both use intrinsics or both don't? > Sometimes, you just want to see As-it-says, look for more-secs less-gz-source-code -- probably less optimised.
- igouy 2y ago* But it’s not that easy. Filters some but maybe not all and maybe filters some wrongly.