3 ms·
Isn’t this possible with any untyped language? It does sound like a good feature though - very few languages have opt-out type checking. This is much better th
by fire_lake 2y ago
Isn’t this possible with any untyped language?
It does sound like a good feature though - very few languages have opt-out type checking. This is much better than opt-in IMO.
- conartist6 2y agoYes and no. You need a universal way of saying "something that should exist here is missing"
- 7h3kk1d 2y agoHazel will also run incomplete programs around holes. Most untyped languages will just crash as soon as something is incomplete.
- instig007 2y agoLaziness would be enough for this case, Haskell will happily run your programs around undefined