2 ms·
No. You're wrong about this. You cannot simply reduce human intelligence to this definition and also be correct.
by krainboltgreene 2y ago
No. You're wrong about this. You cannot simply reduce human intelligence to this definition and also be correct.
- naasking 2y agoBecause...?
- krainboltgreene 2y agoFor the same reason you can't reduce a human to simply a bag of atoms and expect to understand the person.
- naasking 2y agoBut humans are a specific type of a bag of atoms, and humans do (mostly) understand what they say and do, so that's not a legitimate argument against the reducibility of "understanding" to a such a bag of atoms (or specific kind of next token prediction for LLMs).
- Jarwain 2y agoWhy? Frankly, based on a looot of introspection and messing around with altered states of consciousness, it feels pretty on point and lines up with how I see my brain working.