3 ms·
I understand the cost issue for a large family, but he said "so that we don’t have to deal with flying", not "it's too expensive". Also, SFO to JFK is as low a
by modeless 2y ago
I understand the cost issue for a large family, but he said "so that we don’t have to deal with flying", not "it's too expensive".
Also, SFO to JFK is as low as $640 round trip for a family of 5 on the right days, and $760 in gas at 25 MPG and $3.30/gal. Plus you're going to need several nights of lodging unless you want to spend 40 straight hours in a car packed with kids.
I see you edited your comment to change the destination to Nebraska to make your numbers look better. Round trip SFO to Omaha for a family of 5 can be had for $655 according to Google Flights, vs. $440 in gas at 25 MPG and $3.30/gal, but again you'll need at least two nights of lodging for the whole family, and on a trip that long you should also account for part of an oil change and tire change and other car maintenance expenses.
- mckn1ght 2y agoNot to mention the cost of your time, which should factor highly for well paid people that can afford to fly anyways, and if you are low paid, it’s likely your vacation time is scarce, so you wouldn’t want to use it all in the transport. The comparison just makes no sense to me. I take road trips because I love road trips, not because I think the economics are somehow better than flying.