I played around with it a bit, here are some hot takes. For context, I first tried this procession of searches on the Mac OS app. 1. "Who won the world series

I played around with it a bit, here are some hot takes. For context, I first tried this procession of searches on the Mac OS app. 1. "Who won the world series" 2. Who was the MVP?" 3. "Give me his bio" My observations: 1. UX: The "search" button feels oddly placed, but I can't put my finger on it. But once I got it is a toggle, it wasn't a bit deal. 2. The first result had 3 logos, headlines and timestamps delineated, and easy to ready. The second one and third ones included a "Sources" button that opened a fly open menu. Clicking those opened a web link. The third result also included images in the fly open. 3. Citations were also inlined. The third result, for the bio, included a citation per paragraph. 4. It wasn't as fast as google. Which makes sense, given it's going through the LLM. But it will take a while to rewire my brain to expect slower responses to search. 5. Overall, I found the chat interface a very intuitive interface. The second search I asked was "Give me a plan for a Thanksgiving meal." I to a long response that felt like a weird mashup of LLM-generated content and search results: 1. A list of menu selections 2. Links to some recipes 3. Prepration timeline 4. Shopping list 5. Additional tips There were 15 citations listed in the popup button, but only 3 inlined. This was... not great. A traditional list of search results feels better here. Overall, I like the direction. Innovation in search has been dead for close to 10 years, and this feels like I'd use it for certain inquiries.