> Java it's a bit more boiler plate-y, had a bit less features and ease of use Maybe slightly. But the difference is too marginal to change languages over. >

> Java it's a bit more boiler plate-y, had a bit less features and ease of use Maybe slightly. But the difference is too marginal to change languages over. > had many libraries and frameworks that did the same thing Maybe, but it also has many more libraries doing the one obscure thing that you need for your domain. In a vacuum, C# is a very good language, probably better than Java (as it should be given that it was able to learn some lessons from early Java). But in the wider world of programming languages they really are extremely close to each other, they're suitable for exactly the same problems, and Java has a substantially greater mass of libraries/tooling and probably always will do.