3 ms·
The minimum number of colleagues you could have had to arrive at those ratios is 400. Assuming you've had 400 colleagues, we can break down your ratios into: -
by fallingsquirrel 2y ago
The minimum number of colleagues you could have had to arrive at those ratios is 400. Assuming you've had 400 colleagues, we can break down your ratios into:
- 380 men
- 19 women producing good code
- 1 woman producing bad code
I think the error bars on that one woman would be quite large, too large to draw any conclusions.
Now if I guessed wrong and you've actually had not 400, but tens of thousands of colleagues who you've been secretly tracking and ranking in your spare time, maybe you'd have enough data to draw a conclusion.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoIf you are going to suggest someone has effectively said something meaningless, why not break it down properly and calculate the error bars? I'll be just as lazy...4x the number of male duds across that number of observations? It's going to be statistically significant.