> liability should be on corporations selling the LLM as a solution I agree. There was a period of time (don't know if it's still the case), where Microsoft Wi

> liability should be on corporations selling the LLM as a solution I agree. There was a period of time (don't know if it's still the case), where Microsoft Windows licenses/ToS expressly and explicitly did not warrant the use of the OS for a whole bunch of critical use-cases (e.g. anything with the word 'nuclear' in it). If the vendor doesn't warrant it for that use, then you'd be remiss in your duty to your company to ignore that and choose to use it for that purpose. Caveat emptor.