Is "paternal twins" a linguistic borrowing of some sort? It seems a relatively novel form of what I've mostly seen referred to as monozygotic / 'identical' twin

Is "paternal twins" a linguistic borrowing of some sort? It seems a relatively novel form of what I've mostly seen referred to as monozygotic / 'identical' twins. Searching for some kind of semi-canonical confirmation of its widespread use turns up one, maybe two articles where it's treated as an orthodox term, and at least an equal number of discussions admonishing its use.