4 ms·
Not my usage experience with LLMs. But that aside, poorly performing general intelligence might just not be very valuable compared to highly performing narrow o
by RandomLensman 2y ago
Not my usage experience with LLMs. But that aside, poorly performing general intelligence might just not be very valuable compared to highly performing narrow or even zero intelligence.
- famouswaffles 2y agoWell LLMs are very useful and valuable to me and many others today so it's not really a hypothetical future. I'm very glad they exist and there's no narrow intelligence available that is a sufficient substitute.
- RandomLensman 2y agoNot disputing that, but still think as far as reasoning or thinking machines are concerned it is a dead end.
- famouswaffles 2y agoI see. Well as far as I'm concerned, they already reason with the standards we apply to ourselves. People do seem to have higher standards for machines but you can't eat your cake and have it. You can't call what you do reasoning and turn around and call the same thing something else because of preconceived notions of what "true" reasoning should be.