3 ms·
I'd argue Alaska's system is even better. They have a top-4 jungle primary. Everyone focuses on the ranked-choice voting general election they have that follows
by the_snooze 2y ago
I'd argue Alaska's system is even better. They have a top-4 jungle primary. Everyone focuses on the ranked-choice voting general election they have that follows, but I think letting 4 candidates advance out of the primary is an improvement because it weakens the primary electorate's power to eliminate candidates early. And as mentioned, the primary electorate is tiny and probably not representative of the population as a whole.