3 ms·
I think their point was they think the law should be based off of harms, not necessarily "morals" (since no one can seem to decide on those).
by programjames 2y ago
I think their point was they think the law should be based off of harms, not necessarily "morals" (since no one can seem to decide on those).
- int_19h 2y agoGP is saying that people who want this to be a crime are morally outraged that someone else might disagree, and so it's impossible to have a reasonable debate with them about it. They're probably correct, but it never hurts to try.
- programjames 2y agoOof, I fell victim to Poe's law