5 ms·
It has nothing to do with morality. Price is one way to allocate scarce resources. History suggests it is the least worst. But why, morally, should someone wh
by qeternity 2y ago
It has nothing to do with morality.
Price is one way to allocate scarce resources. History suggests it is the least worst.
But why, morally, should someone who had the free time to sit in a queue, or was lucky enough to win a lottery, be more entitled versus someone willing to pay 10x what someone else is? Scalpers facilitate this. I don't have time to try to get face value tickets. But I work hard in a good job and I have disposable income. So I can, effectively, pay a scalper to do this for me. Am I less deserving of a ticket?
The reality is that the vast majority of secondary market supply comes from artist/venue/promoter related parties. Taylor Swift cannot price tickets at $5,000 because it would be a PR nightmare. So she sells a small amount publicly, which are snapped up by scalpers who know the true price is much higher. And TS quietly sells a ton more at these true prices while saving face.
- greenie_beans 2y agoyou should read some blake or wordsworth to balance how much you read lesswrong.com
- qeternity 2y agoNice. Have never read lesswrong once in my life.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- greenie_beans 2y agosorry for my snark but for real you might find "notes from underground" by dostoevsky a good read
- Writingdorky 2y ago[dead]
- stevage 2y ago> Am I less deserving of a ticket? This is literally a question of morality.
- qeternity 2y agoIt's called a leading question. I am, imho, not less deserving, and therefore it's not a moral issue.
- GrantMoyer 2y ago> But I work hard in a good job and I have disposable income. So I can, effectively, pay a scalper to do this for me. Am I less deserving of a ticket? No, but you're not more deserving either.
- cebu_blue 2y ago[dead]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]