If I look at the comments of this post my conclusion is that using "true" and "know" is hiding what the actual result is from a lot of people. So people get stu

If I look at the comments of this post my conclusion is that using "true" and "know" is hiding what the actual result is from a lot of people. So people get stuck on meaningless discussions. Seeing this makes me conclude that it is a bad choice from the knowledge transfer point of view for the scientific community. It would be better to use more objective/less emotionally charged words (which is what I understand by scientific language). If I now talk about my personal experience, when I read this article I have to "translate" in my head every appearance of those words to something that I can work with and is objective. And I find that annoying.