3 ms·

This assumes that human reviews also catch these which is DEFINITELY not the case either. As long as you have good pipelines, linters, a careful suite of tests

• sksxihve 2y ago
  Your never going to catch 100% of issues, human or AI review, but I've found that in code reviews a lot of the benefit is when people ask questions about the code being reviewed and have a discussion on it. Is the AI tool going to ask why something was implemented in a way that might not match the requirement specs? Is it even going to know what the requirements are for the code or is it going to rubber stamp a review because the code looks reasonable? If you think human code reviews offer very very little benefit then you probably aren't doing them right.
• t43562 2y ago
  PR reviewing isn't really about finding bugs because the tests should be doing that - but are the tests good enough? Is the approach sound and aligned with the architecture? And does anyone else understand it apart from the author?