3 ms·
It’s not my opinion, it’s a statistical fact. Php was a pioneer and it deserves its respect for that. Bit it never was a tool for example to create next kafka w
by aristofun 2y ago
It’s not my opinion, it’s a statistical fact. Php was a pioneer and it deserves its respect for that. Bit it never was a tool for example to create next kafka with, or at least build some api gateway etc.
Laravel and others “advanced wordpress” use cases is not a “serious software” from technical POV.
- 1_1xdev1 2y ago> Because it’s a) scripting language b) not even a good one. > Even if modern versions somehow overcome those limitations - nobody would bet an expensive project while there are plenty of more relevant alternatives No, b) is absolutely your opinion (how can "LangX is not a good scripting language" be "statistical fact"? Come on.) a) -- depends on your definition of expensive, but, again, I point to the tons of new (and old) companies choosing python all the time, even if some other language is "better" (for whatever your definition of better is) We agree that neither PHP nor python would be good fits for building a database or similar. Doesn't make my points wrong.
- aristofun 2y agoAgain - python was not originally a shitty templating engine. It doesn’t have all the bad sides and legacy of php. Give me a single objective reason someone should prefer php over other (better) scripting languages in 2024?