2 ms·
It's 60 days, not 50. But 60 days of severance would be significantly less than what they are offering. They're definitely not doing it strictly to avoid regula
by sgerenser 2y ago
It's 60 days, not 50. But 60 days of severance would be significantly less than what they are offering. They're definitely not doing it strictly to avoid regulatory scrutiny, more like to avoid bad press and a bad reputation in the tech market. When things eventually swing back up, companies still want to be able to hire the best talent, they don't want to be grouped with companies like Twitter.
- objektif 2y agoWhat is wrong with Twitter?
- mbbbb 2y agoThey did not pay severance when they laid people off.
- sgerenser 2y agoEven worse, they said they would then reneged.
- TechDebtDevin 2y agoYeah, they used weird conditions upon their termination to claw back severance