3 ms·
> I guess i understand seeing as you couldn't have read the paper in the 5 minutes it took for your response. You've posted the papers multiple times over the
by foobarqux 2y ago
> I guess i understand seeing as you couldn't have read the paper in the 5 minutes it took for your response.
You've posted the papers multiple times over the last few months, so no I did not read them in the last five minutes though you could in fact find both of the very basic problems I cited in that amount of time.
- famouswaffles 2y agoIf you've come upon the previous posts organically, why not address it then? and Why act like it's the first time here ? I'm even less willing to engage.
- foobarqux 2y agoBecause it's pointless to reply to a comment days after it was made or after engagement with the post has died down. All of this is a convenient misdirection for not having read and understood the papers you keep posting because you like the headlines.
- famouswaffles 2y agoOk. I've addressed it now.