By the same arguments: People who live can also be divided into groups who would have and who would not have paid for a game. There is damage done, despite all

By the same arguments: People who live can also be divided into groups who would have and who would not have paid for a game. There is damage done, despite all the people who only live ethically. Even the people who do something else (than buying a game that can't be bought) could end up withholding money from the industry because their gaming needs are met by something else. That's not an argument for why "something else" is bad. It's ridiculous.